Cumulus Controversy Arises: Are Clouds Evil? One Individual's Unconventional Theory Sparks Debate

In a thought-provoking twist to meteorological discourse, one individual has ignited a heated debate by questioning the innocence of clouds. The inquiry, initially dismissed as whimsical has since gained traction promoting experts and enthusiasts alike to weigh in on the matter.

The controversy began when Andrew Cotton-Candy, a self proclaimed amateur meteorologist, took to social media to propose an unconventional theory: clouds could potentially harbor malevolent intentions, shaping weather patterns to wreak havoc on unsuspecting communities.

While the notion of clouds being malevolent entities may seem far fetched to many, the discussion quickly gained momentum, with supporters and skeptics engaging in spirited exchanges online and offline. Some individuals expressed solidarity with Cotton-Candy's conjecture, sharing anecdotes of eerie cloud formations preceding natural disasters or ominous weather events.

We have reached out to our local meteorologists to make a statement and here's what they had to say,

"By all accounts it seems as if clouds do not have the inteligence to even perceive evil. A cloud is simply a natural phenomenon resulting from the condensation of water vapor in the atmosphere."